Sunday, April 14, 2019

Joe's Internet -- Addressing and Interconnection

In the last installment, Routing Policy -- interconnecting with other networks, we talked about the business relationships Joe's Internet (J-Inet) might have with other networks.  Now we'll look a little closer at the technical side of how those relationships are enacted on the network itself.

Before we get too much closer to J-Inet, I want to point out that I'm going to be using a single network model for continuity between posts.  I've worked out IP addressing (v4 & v6), consistent routing policies, and a topology that should suffice for many posts. I've got several posts lined up that should help show at least one path to building a scalable network.

The Interconnects

J-Inet has two transit providers (Transit 1 & 2), three customers (Customer A, B, & C), and a single Peer (Peer 1).  Customer C is a bit of stretch for this conversation.  They aren't an autonomous system, but we'll look at them anyway, as it may lead some readers to revelations they might not have otherwise.

J-Inet has four Points of Presence (POPs) where equipment is housed.  Most customers of J-Inet are like Customer C.  They simply buy transit from J-Inet.  These customers actually make up the bulk of J-Inet's revenue.  But they're pretty boring from an network perspective.

The Network, Prefixes, and Policy



The network itself is pretty simple, and looks like this:
Joe's Internet -- Simple Map
Over view J-Inet's network and interconnects.  Click on it for more detail

J-Inet has two blocks of address space it uses internally, that we will advertise to anyone that interconnects.  Those prefixes are: 172.16.32.0/21 and 192.168.92.0/22

Customer A uses 172.16.36.0/24.  That block comes from J-Inet's prefixes, but they are allowed to use it as long as they are a customer of J-Inet.  J-Inet also allows Customer A to advertise this prefix across any interconnects they may have with other networks.  J-Inet will pass all of the prefixes it knows about to Customer A.

Customer B uses 10.193.32.0/22, which was allocated to them from their Regional Internet Registry.  They advertise this prefix to us, and any other interconnects they have according to their own routing policy. J-Inet will pass advertise all routes to Customer B.

Customer C uses 192.168.93.112/28.  They don't have any other interconnects, so they aren't really an autonomous system (AS).  They're in this mix as a kind of anti-example -- a customer that really only acts as an extension of J-Inet's network and routing policy.  Neither Customer C nor J-Inet will advertise prefixes to one another.

Peer 1 is another ISP that happens to have equipment in the same building that houses POP 1.  J-Inet and the Peer 1 decided that they should interconnect directly.  They will be announcing 172.16.34.0/24 to J-Inet.  J-Inet will pass internal and customer prefixes to Peer 1, but will not send any routes learned from transit providers.

Transit 1 and Transit 2 are networks that have customers and other interconnects.  Since they are transit providers, they have promised to get traffic to any destination. However, they bouth announce prefixes to us, J-Inet can make an informed decision about which network should be used for any given prefix.  J-Inet will announce internal routes and customer routes to both transit providers.  J-Inet will not advertise routes learned from Peer1.  Lastly, J-Inet will not advertise any transit routes back to either transit provider.  (i.e. J-Inet will not allow transit to the these providers.)

At this point, we have a pretty good idea of J-Inet's network topology and how it interconnects with customers, peers and transit providers.  In our next installment, we'll look at some of the internal housekeeping of J-Inet's network is put together, and later use this internal configuration to make our interconnects simpler.

Monday, April 1, 2019

Routing Policy -- interconnecting with other networks

The next few posts about Joe's Internet (J-Inet) will start with our routing policy, and refine it based on some ideas concerning how to describe the interconnections between networks.  We'll get a look at J-Inet's network soon, and eventually we'll see how the router configurations enact the routing policy.  For now, let's get a grounding in how we can describe links between networks, and how they relate with routing policy.

J-Inet has a simple management philosophy when it comes to interconnecting with other networks.  In summary:
  • keep things as simple as possible
  • minimize costs
  • maximize revenue

These thoughts are going to be the basis of our routing policy -- make money while keeping things simple and cheap.

Types of interconnection

The types of networks we are discussing are referred to as Autonomous Systems (ASes).  Within any AS are destinations referred to as prefixes or routes.  When an AS interconnects with another, they advertise their prefixes to the other -- essentially offering a path to that destination.

It turns out that if you learn about three simple types of business relationships, you can understand the vast majority of AS interconnection types:

  • Transit  -- If you buy Internet connectivity from someone, they are a transit provider.  You can hand them traffic, and they will deliver it to the desired recipient, or will pass that traffic across their network to a provider that can get the traffic closer to its destination.  For our purposes, if you pay people to take your traffic, you're buying transit.
  • Customer -- If you supply transit to another network, they are a customer.  The simplest customer relies on you completely, and more complex customers look at you in the same way you look at your transit provider(s).  For our purposes, customers pay you to be their transit provider.
  • Peering -- Sometimes, networks find that it is mutually advantageous to interconnect, and they decide to do so without either side paying for the privilege.  Common customers, shared geographic regions, and other factors may influence if networks will become peers.  We aren't going to worry about *why* some of our neighbors a peers -- we will just know that they are.

Egress Policy

As the number of interconnections increase, the odds of having more than a single path to a given prefix grows.  Our policy will give us guidance about which type of interconnection we wish to use, and we will rank prefix advertisements in this order:

  1. Customer -- Goal:  Maximize revenue.  Always use this path if available.
  2. Peers -- Goal: Minimize cost: Use this path before using one to a transit provider.
  3. Transit -- Goal: Minimize cost.  Use this path only if no better path exists.

Prefix Advertisement Policy

Business policy shaped how we prioritize the choice of multiple egress paths.  Likewise, what we choose to advertise across an interconnection point is shaped by our policy as well.  In this case the reasoning becomes:
  • Transit  -- Goal: Minimize costs.  Only advertise internal prefixes and those that your are paid to carry (e.g. prefixes learned from Customers), thus minimizing traffic.
  • Customer -- Goal: Maximize revenue.  Advertise every prefix you know about to maximize traffic.
  • Peering -- Goal: Minimize costs.  Advertise the same set of prefixes as sent to Transit providers, in the hope of reducing transit costs.

Parting thoughts and a glimpse of the future


By describing AS interconnections as one of three different types, we've been able to express some routing goals that will support our business goals.  In the next installment, we'll look at a map of J-Inet, start to see actual prefixes, and classify the inter-AS interconnects.

In other future installments, we will start to put together router configurations that will allow us to enact this routing policy.  At first, we'll use Cisco vocabulary, and stick with IPv4, but the plan is to use a single network to show the use of other vendor's gear as well. Stick around, this should be fun...

Monday, March 25, 2019

Project Hummingbird

Originally posted to Facebook on January 12, 2018 I thought this should be available outside of Facebook:

This may be long, but I came upon an old floppy (a floppy!) today, and found the drawing you see here. I'm about to turn 50, so let me spin a tale from when I wasn't even half my current age...
Project Hummingbird
Some friends and I had to build "something" for our engineering senior design course. A friend had a model airplane remote control setup and wanted to play with "ducted fans." We came up with an idea for an aircraft we had a hard time describing to people.
Rather than wings, we were going to generate lift with pure thrust from the ducted fans! It was going to be the prototype for vertical take off and landing craft, and be a darn cool model to fly around.
Today, you can go buy a drone, and fly something similar, but in 1990, this was something no one had seen in radio controlled aircraft.
We had *NO* idea how much we'd bitten off.
To fit our budget constraint, we could only afford two of the ducted fan assemblies and engines. So we had to design a set of ducts to split the two sets of thrust into four so that we could control the craft.
To generate the thrust required, we had to have ducts that were over five inches in diameter. To keep control, we needed the nozzles over 20 inches from the center of the craft. This means that the craft needed to be about a foot high, and nearly four feet across.
Naturally, we designed it as a saucer.
We managed to fabricate one set of ducts, and showed that it generated more thrust than we had calculated. We got prototype control circuits mocked up before we realized we couldn't afford the gyroscopes available at the time. We learned the types of things you're supposed to learn in a senior design course.
But I *still* want to see that thing fly...

Friday, March 22, 2019

Joe's Internet -- a place so see how layer 3 works

I've learned a lot about networking from others over the years.  Usenet news, conferences, mailing lists, forums, blogs, and podcasts have been central to my learning at one point or another.  I was always learning from others, so I never really felt that I had all that much to contribute.

Lately, I've realized that a different voice telling the same story might help someone, so I decided I should start giving something to the community.

Over the last few years, I played around with the idea of Joe's Internet (J-Inet).  I've already posted one story about J-Inet and a foray into IPv6.  (In fact, the response to that addressing adventure was a big prompt to get me to write more.)

In the next few posts I'll show you the architecture of J-Inet.  We'll talk about routing policy, or the plain language that describes how we route Internet traffic.  As things progress, we'll get into router
configurations required to enact that routing policy.

I'll start with generic Cisco IOS configurations, because that's what I learned starting back in the 90s.  However, I'll swing back around and show how it can be done with different vendor's gear.  In the end, I hope people will figure out that all gear should play nicely together and that heterogeneous networking can work well.

Keep watching this space.  If I get my way, you'll learn something -- or at least get a new perspective of things you already know.  I'd like to hear your perspectives as well.

Welcome to J-Inet.  We push packets.

Friday, February 1, 2019

The Brothers WISP - Five (or six) tips.

Greg Sowell, of the Brothers WISP, talked to me about networking tips!  Greg and the Brothers do a great job of keeping a community of like-minded folks talking and helping each other.

If you're interested in watching things, take a look: